Burbell v. Emiliani

586 So. 2d 420
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedSeptember 3, 1991
DocketNo. 91-10
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 586 So. 2d 420 (Burbell v. Emiliani) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Burbell v. Emiliani, 586 So. 2d 420 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Thomas Burdell appeals an adverse final judgment and post-judgment orders entered after bench trial. As to Burdell’s first and third points, we think that on a fair reading the complaint is worded broadly enough to embrace the relief awarded. Even if that were not so, the points now being raised were not preserved by timely objection. The issue was thus litigated on the pleadings as made. See Dysart v. Hunt, 383 So.2d 259, 260 (Fla. 3d DCA), review denied, 392 So.2d 1373 (Fla.1980). As to the second point on appeal, the measure of damages was entirely appropriate. Lucas Truck Service Co. v. Hargrove, 443 So.2d 260, 263 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Blanco-Martinez v. Emiliani
588 So. 2d 341 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
586 So. 2d 420, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burbell-v-emiliani-fladistctapp-1991.