Burbank v. Bloom
This text of 23 La. Ann. 476 (Burbank v. Bloom) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The defendant has appealed from a judgment condemning him to pay the amount of damages claimed by the plaintiff for failing to deliver the twenty-five barrels of alcohol and the forty barrels of whisky which the defendant sold to the plaintiff on the tenth day of December, 1804, “to arrive,” and to be delivered, as the plaintiff alleges, in fifteen days.
From the evidence we are satisfied that the judgment appealed from is correct, and the defendant should pay the damages occasioned by the unjustifiable violation of Ms contract.
For the reasons assigned in the written opinion of the learned judge a quo, it is ordered that Ms judgment be affirmed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
23 La. Ann. 476, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burbank-v-bloom-la-1871.