Burbach v. . Sinram
143 N.E. 759, 237 N.Y. 600, 1924 N.Y. LEXIS 898
Opinion
*601 Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: His cock, Ch. J., Cardozo, Pound, McLaughlin, Crane, Andrews and Lehman, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Burbach v. . Sinram, 143 N.E. 759, 237 N.Y. 600, 1924 N.Y. LEXIS 898 (N.Y. 1924).
143 N.E. 759 (Burbach v. . Sinram) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
LIN Broadcasting Corp. v. Metromedia, Inc.
542 N.E.2d 629 (New York Court of Appeals, 1989)
Eckard v. Smith
527 P.2d 660 (Utah Supreme Court, 1974)
Long v. Sergio
30 Misc. 2d 1072 (New York Supreme Court, 1961)
Morgan v. Robinson
5 A.D.2d 980 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1958)
Complete Machinery & Equipment Co. v. Brown-Turner, Inc.
5 A.D.2d 817 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1958)
Whiteside v. Petersen
204 Misc. 1079 (New York Supreme Court, 1953)
London v. Joslovitz
279 A.D. 252 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1952)
Langer v. Stegerwald Lumber Co.
47 N.W.2d 734 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1951)
Dale Carnegie Courses Corp. v. Eastern Courses Corp.
263 A.D. 330 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1942)
Landowners Co. v. Pendry
100 P.2d 632 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1940)
R. I. Realty Co. v. Terrell
172 N.E. 262 (New York Court of Appeals, 1930)