Buraty v. State
638 So. 2d 56, 19 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 311, 1994 Fla. LEXIS 910, 1994 WL 245682
Opinion
We review Buraty v. State, 616 So.2d 550 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993), based on conflict. We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const.
We recently resolved the issue presented in this ease in Metcalf v. State, 635 So.2d 11 (Fla.1994), where we found a due process violation when police used illegally manufactured drugs in a reverse-sting operation. On authority of Metcalf we quash the decision under review.
It is so ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Buraty v. State, 638 So. 2d 56, 19 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 311, 1994 Fla. LEXIS 910, 1994 WL 245682 (Fla. 1994).
638 So. 2d 56 (Buraty v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Metcalf v. State
635 So. 2d 11 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1994)
Buraty v. State
616 So. 2d 550 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)