Burack v. Garrity

12 A.D.2d 951, 212 N.Y.S.2d 1009, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12743

This text of 12 A.D.2d 951 (Burack v. Garrity) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Burack v. Garrity, 12 A.D.2d 951, 212 N.Y.S.2d 1009, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12743 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1961).

Opinion

In an action to recover damages allegedly resulting from the premature entry of a default judgment in a prior action in which the defendant Sparber was the plaintiff and the other defendants, Garrity and Collins, were his attorneys, and in which the plaintiffs were the defendants, the plaintiffs have appealed from several orders of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, determining motions with respect to notices of examination before trial, the pleadings and bill of particulars. This court, by a prior decision, permitted plaintiffs “to discontinue their appeals from the orders made upon their motions addressed to the answers, counterclaims and demand for bill of particulars.” Plaintiffs’ remaining appeals, as now limited by their brief, are as follows: (1) from the whole of an order, dated July 29, 1960, which vacated as premature plaintiffs’ notice to examine before trial the defendants Garrity and Sparber, and which stayed plaintiffs from proceeding with such examination before trial until after they shall have served a reply to the counterclaim of defendant Sparber; (2) from so much of an order, dated the same day, which, as a condition to granting plaintiffs an extension of time to serve their bill of particulars, imposed the requirement that plaintiffs shall “withhold service of any papers for an examination before trial of defendants until after service of said bill of particulars;” and (3) from so much of an order, dated August 26, 1960, made on reargument, as adhered to the decisions in the said orders of [952]*952July 29, 1960. Orders, insofar as appealed from, affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Ughetta, Christ and Brennan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
12 A.D.2d 951, 212 N.Y.S.2d 1009, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12743, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burack-v-garrity-nyappdiv-1961.