Buquo v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Buquo v. State

98 So. 922, 19 Ala. App. 677

Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided February 5, 1924·No. 7 Div. 1.·Published

Opinion

BRICKEN, P J.

The verdict of' the jury found the defendant guilty as charged in the second count of the indictment, the change being the unlawful possession of a still, etc., to be used for the purpose of manufacturing prohibited liquors. Judgment was accordingly *678 pronounced upon this verdict, and sentence duly entered. From this judgment, defendant appealed to this court. The record upon which the appeal is predicated is free from error. The judgment of the circuit court stands (affirmed. Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BRICKEN, P J.

The verdict of' the jury found the defendant guilty as charged in the second count of the indictment, the change being the unlawful possession of a still, etc., to be used for the purpose of manufacturing prohibited liquors. Judgment was accordingly *678 pronounced upon this verdict, and sentence duly entered. From this judgment, defendant appealed to this court. The record upon which the appeal is predicated is free from error. The judgment of the circuit court stands (affirmed. Affirmed.

Buquo v. State, 98 So. 922, 19 Ala. App. 677 (Ala. Ct. App. 1924).

Pincite

98 So. 922 (Buquo v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.