Buonocore v. Dubois

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Buonocore v. Dubois

16 A.D.3d 359, 791 N.Y.S.2d 436, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3361

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 31, 2005

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 16 A.D.3d 359 (Buonocore v. Dubois) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Buonocore v. Dubois, 16 A.D.3d 359, 791 N.Y.S.2d 436, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3361 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Rosalyn Richter, J.), entered on or about November 17, 2004, which, inter alia, granted plaintiffs motion for summary judgment directing the release of certain escrowed funds to him, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

“When a condition of a mortgage loan commitment is not fulfilled through no fault of the purchasers, their performance is excused, as long as they acted in good faith” (Lunning v 10 Bleecker St. Owners Corp., 160 AD2d 178 [1990], lv denied 76 NY2d 710 [1990]). Plaintiff established his prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by adducing documentary evidence showing that he had sought a mortgage diligently and in good faith. Defendants did not, in response, meet their burden to raise a triable factual issue. Concur—Ellerin, J.P., Nardelli, Williams, Gonzalez and Sweeny, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Rosalyn Richter, J.), entered on or about November 17, 2004, which, inter alia, granted plaintiffs motion for summary judgment directing the release of certain escrowed funds to him, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

“When a condition of a mortgage loan commitment is not fulfilled through no fault of the purchasers, their performance is excused, as long as they acted in good faith” (Lunning v 10 Bleecker St. Owners Corp., 160 AD2d 178 [1990], lv denied 76 NY2d 710 [1990]). Plaintiff established his prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by adducing documentary evidence showing that he had sought a mortgage diligently and in good faith. Defendants did not, in response, meet their burden to raise a triable factual issue. Concur—Ellerin, J.P., Nardelli, Williams, Gonzalez and Sweeny, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

16 A.D.3d 359, 791 N.Y.S.2d 436, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3361, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/buonocore-v-dubois-nyappdiv-2005.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack