Bunner v. Neil
This text of 1 U.S. 457 (Bunner v. Neil) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This cause was removed by Habeas Corpus from the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County, and, on the trial, a verdict was found in favor of the Plaintiff, for £4. 10. 8. which the defendant paid to the Prothonotary, and then moved to stay proceedings, contending, that as the Plaintiffs demand was reduced below £. 10. by a direct payment, and not by discount, or set off, the Plaintiff must pay the costs.
The Plaintiff, on the other hand, obtained a rule to shew cause, why the Defendant should not pay double costs, under the Act of Assembly, which provides, that, if the defendant removes the cause, and a sum under £.50 is found for the Plaintiff, the Defendant shall pay double costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1 U.S. 457, 1 Dall. 457, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bunner-v-neil-pa-1789.