Bunn v. Gamble
This text of 188 S.E. 257 (Bunn v. Gamble) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. Where there is more than one party defendant, either party defendant may, after the rendition of a judgment against both defendants, enter an appeal. Code, § 6-110. A surety on a replevy bond executed by a defendant in attachment, where the obligation, which is joint and several, is to pay whatever judgment the plaintiff in attachment may obtain against the defendant in attachment, including court costs (Code, § 8-701), is not (although judgment may have been rendered against the defendant, and also against the surety as re[418]*418quired by statute) a necessary and essential party to an appeal by the defendant in attachment from the judgment rendered.
2. Where an appeal is entered by a defendant in attachment from the judgment rendered against him and the surety upon the statutory replevy bond, the appeal is not subject to dismissal upon the ground that the surety is not a party appellant, or, where the appeal is made by the defendant in forma pauperis and the surety did not make an affidavit in forma pauperis, that the required costs have not been paid. Macon & Brunswick Railroad v. Washington, 69 Ga. 764; Barnett v. Travis, 96 Ga. 760 (22 S. E. 314) ; Morse v. Turner, 20 Ga. App. 108 (92 S. E. 767).
3. Appeals may be taken from judgments in the municipal court of Savannah, to the superior court of Chatham County, in accordance with the same rules and regulations applicable to appeals from justices’ courts. See Acts 1927, p. 457, sec. 4.
4. The superior court erred in dismissing the appeal.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
188 S.E. 257, 54 Ga. App. 417, 1936 Ga. App. LEXIS 610, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bunn-v-gamble-gactapp-1936.