Bunn v. Croul

10 Johns. 239
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedMay 15, 1813
StatusPublished
Cited by17 cases

This text of 10 Johns. 239 (Bunn v. Croul) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bunn v. Croul, 10 Johns. 239 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1813).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

It cannot fairly be inferred, from the return, that the explanation given by the justice to the ji^ry, after they had retired to make up their verdict, was by the consent, or in the presence, of the parties; if it was not, the allowance of such a practice would be dangerous to the rights of parties. The justice’s recollection might not be accurate as to what the witnesses had said; and for that reason the testimony might be misstated, when, if the parties were present, or the witnesses again called "to repeat their testimony, any mistake might be corrected. The judgment must be reversed.

Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Finn Hannevig & Co. v. Frankel
219 A.D. 54 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1926)
Welker v. Allen
39 Misc. 523 (New York County Courts, 1902)
Kehrley v. Shafer
36 N.Y.S. 510 (New York Supreme Court, 1895)
People v. Linzey
29 N.Y.S. 560 (New York Supreme Court, 1894)
Walsh v. Matchett
26 N.Y.S. 43 (New York Court of Common Pleas, 1893)
Valentine v. Kelly
7 N.Y.S. 184 (New York Supreme Court, 1889)
Cornish v. Graff
43 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 160 (New York Supreme Court, 1885)
Wiggins v. Downer
67 How. Pr. 65 (New York Supreme Court, 1884)
Mahoney v. Decker
25 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 365 (New York Supreme Court, 1879)
Watertown Bank and Loan Co. v. . Mix
51 N.Y. 558 (New York Court of Appeals, 1873)
In re the Accounting in Kelly's Estate
1 Tuck. Surr. 28 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1870)
Schappner v. Second Avenue Railroad
55 Barb. 497 (New York Supreme Court, 1870)
Glines v. Smith
48 N.H. 259 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1869)
Snow v. Hardy
3 Minn. 77 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1859)
Hancock v. Salmon
8 Barb. 564 (New York Supreme Court, 1850)
Taylor v. Baldwin
10 Barb. 582 (New York Supreme Court, 1850)
Shapley v. White
6 N.H. 172 (Superior Court of New Hampshire, 1833)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
10 Johns. 239, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bunn-v-croul-nysupct-1813.