Bunker v. United States Army

668 F. App'x 538
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided September 16, 2016·No. No. 16-1565·Published

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Pamela Jo Bunker appeals the district court’s order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Bunker’s informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, Bunker has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. See Williams v. Giant Food Inc., 370 F.3d 423, 430 n.4 (4th Cir. 2004). Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bunker v. United States Army, 668 F. App'x 538 (4th Cir. 2016).

668 F. App'x 538 (Bunker v. United States Army) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Williams v. Giant Food Inc.
370 F.3d 423 (Fourth Circuit, 2004)