Bunker v. United States Army

668 F. App'x 538
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedSeptember 16, 2016
DocketNo. 16-1565
StatusPublished

This text of 668 F. App'x 538 (Bunker v. United States Army) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bunker v. United States Army, 668 F. App'x 538 (4th Cir. 2016).

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Pamela Jo Bunker appeals the district court’s order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Bunker’s informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, Bunker has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. See Williams v. Giant Food Inc., 370 F.3d 423, 430 n.4 (4th Cir. 2004). Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Williams v. Giant Food Inc.
370 F.3d 423 (Fourth Circuit, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
668 F. App'x 538, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bunker-v-united-states-army-ca4-2016.