Bunker Ramo Corp. v. Irizarry

New York Court of Appeals

Bunker Ramo Corp. v. Irizarry

360 N.E.2d 959, 40 N.Y.2d 1045, 392 N.Y.S.2d 282, 1976 N.Y. LEXIS 3231

DecidedDecember 22, 1976

StatusPublished

This text of 360 N.E.2d 959 (Bunker Ramo Corp. v. Irizarry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bunker Ramo Corp. v. Irizarry, 360 N.E.2d 959, 40 N.Y.2d 1045, 392 N.Y.S.2d 282, 1976 N.Y. LEXIS 3231 (N.Y. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment affirmed, without costs (see Quotron Systems v Gallman, 39 NY2d 428, revg 47 AD2d 719). Costs are not awarded because of failure to rebrief the case after this court’s decision in Quotron (supra, decided May 4, 1976), of which both parties were aware, and their continued reliance on the Appellate Division determination in that case.

Concur: Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Cooke.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment affirmed, without costs (see Quotron Systems v Gallman, 39 NY2d 428, revg 47 AD2d 719). Costs are not awarded because of failure to rebrief the case after this court’s decision in Quotron (supra, decided May 4, 1976), of which both parties were aware, and their continued reliance on the Appellate Division determination in that case.

Concur: Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Cooke.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

360 N.E.2d 959, 40 N.Y.2d 1045, 392 N.Y.S.2d 282, 1976 N.Y. LEXIS 3231, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bunker-ramo-corp-v-irizarry-ny-1976.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack