Bunger v. Green River

Supreme Court

Bunger v. Green River

300 U.S. 638, 57 S. Ct. 510

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided March 1, 1937·No. No. 692·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The motion of the appellee to dismiss the appeal is granted, and the appeal is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question. (1) Gundling v. Chicago, 177 U. S. 183, 188; Western Turf Assn. v. Greenberg, 204 U. S. 359, 363; Williams v. Arkansas, 217 U. S. 79. (2) Lindsley v. Natural Carbonic Gas Co., 220 U. S. 61, 81 ; Central Lumber Co. v. South Dakota, 226 U. S. 157, 160; Bryant v. Zimmerman, 278 U. S. 63, 73. (3) Asbell v. Kansas, 209 U. S. 251, 254, 255; Savage v. Jones, 225 U. S. 501, 525; Hartford Indemnity Co. v. Illinois, 298 U. S. 155, 158.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

The motion of the appellee to dismiss the appeal is granted, and the appeal is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question. (1) Gundling v. Chicago, 177 U. S. 183, 188; Western Turf Assn. v. Greenberg, 204 U. S. 359, 363; Williams v. Arkansas, 217 U. S. 79. (2) Lindsley v. Natural Carbonic Gas Co., 220 U. S. 61, 81 ; Central Lumber Co. v. South Dakota, 226 U. S. 157, 160; Bryant v. Zimmerman, 278 U. S. 63, 73. (3) Asbell v. Kansas, 209 U. S. 251, 254, 255; Savage v. Jones, 225 U. S. 501, 525; Hartford Indemnity Co. v. Illinois, 298 U. S. 155, 158.

Bunger v. Green River, 300 U.S. 638, 57 S. Ct. 510 (1937).

Pincite

300 U.S. 638 (Bunger v. Green River) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related