Bunger v. Bunger

160 P. 976, 99 Kan. 22
CourtSupreme Court of Kansas
DecidedNovember 11, 1916
DocketNo. 20,113
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 160 P. 976 (Bunger v. Bunger) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Kansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bunger v. Bunger, 160 P. 976, 99 Kan. 22 (kan 1916).

Opinion

[23]*23The opinion of the court was delivered by

Porter, J.:

This is an appeal from a judgment denying plaintiff a divorce.

In a brief filed amici curiee we are asked to dismiss the action because of the death of the plaintiff, which occurred subsequently to the appeal, and because no property rights are involved in the action.

It appears from the record that the sole purpose of the action was to dissolve the marriage relation of the parties. No property rights of the parties or other persons were involved in the controversy; in.fact, nothing is involved but a mere status, and plaintiff’s cause of action, being personal to himself, every right he had with respect thereto is terminated, and his death abates the action. (Blair v. Blair, 96 Kan. 757, 760, 153 Pac. 544; 1 C. J. 169.)

While it is clear that the appeal must be dismissed, it is proper to say that we have examined the record, and the contention that the judgment should be reversed on the ground that the court erred in refusing a decree goes merely to the weight of the evidence, and there is no merit in the only point raised by the appeal.

It is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Craig v. Craig
202 P. 594 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1921)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
160 P. 976, 99 Kan. 22, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bunger-v-bunger-kan-1916.