Bundy v. Williams
1 Root 543
This text of 1 Root 543 (Bundy v. Williams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Bundy v. Williams, 1 Root 543 (Colo. 1793).
Opinion
Judgment —• That the declaration is insufficient. Although in chancery the plaintiff’s remedy is against all the adminis[544]*544trators 'who joined in tbe covenants, yet tbe legal remedy survives only against tbe surviving covenantor and ber legal representative.
Query-— Tbe reason wby the remedy in sucb case ought not to be tbe same at law as in chancery.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
1 Root 543, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bundy-v-williams-conn-1793.