Bundy v. United States
This text of 594 F. App'x 169 (Bundy v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Sean R. Bundy appeals the district court’s order denying his petition for a writ of error coram nobis. We have reviewed the record and find no abuse of discretion. See Bereano v. United States, 706 F.3d 568, 575 (4th Cir.2013) (stating standard of review). Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials be[170]*170fore this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
594 F. App'x 169, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bundy-v-united-states-ca4-2015.