Bundy v. Florida Parole & Probation Commission

419 So. 2d 1181, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 21317
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 6, 1982·No. No. AG-375·Published

Opinions

MILLS, Judge.

Bundy appeals Florida Parole and Probation Commission action establishing his presumptive parole release date. We affirm.

Bundy argues that § 947.165(1), Florida Statutes (1981), prohibits an aggravation for exceptionally brutal or heinous behavior because a depraved mind is an element of second degree murder of which he was convicted. We do not agree.

A depraved mind is equated with the common meaning of malice, i.e., ill will, hatred, spite, or evil intent, an indifference to life. Marasa v. State, 394 So.2d 544 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981). This is less than brutal or heinous, in particular, two shootings, strangulation, repeated stabbing, and a beating. Exceptionally brutal behavior is not an element of second degree murder.

No violation of the plea bargain is revealed in the record, nor is this the proper forum to raise this issue.

No abuse of discretion is shown in the Commission’s failure to apply certain mitigating factors.

AFFIRMED.

WIGGINTON, J., concurs. ERVIN, J., dissents with opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bundy v. Florida Parole & Probation Commission, 419 So. 2d 1181, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 21317 (Fla. Ct. App. 1982).

419 So. 2d 1181 (Bundy v. Florida Parole & Probation Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Marasa v. State
394 So. 2d 544 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)
Hines v. State
227 So. 2d 334 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1969)
Weaver v. State
220 So. 2d 53 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1969)
Ramsey v. State
154 So. 855 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1934)