Bundy v. Bien

Supreme Court of Colorado

Bundy v. Bien

269 P.2d 707, 129 Colo. 286, 1954 Colo. LEXIS 402

Supreme Court of Colorado·Decided April 12, 1954·No. No. 17,273·Published

Opinion

Mr. Justice Knauss

delivered the opinion of the Court.

Plaintiff, a guest in defendant’s automobile, was injured when defendant’s automobile collided with another vehicle, and sued for damages. The defense was under section 371, chapter 16, 1935 C.S.A., commonly known as the guest statute. Plaintiff had judgment based on a jury verdict in his favor. Defendant brings the cause here by writ of error.

[287] On authority of Clark v. Hicks, 127 Colo. 25, 252 P. (2d) 1067; Dameron v. West, 126 Colo. 435, 250 P. (2d) 592, and Murrow v. Whiteley, 125 Colo. 392, 244 P. (2d) 657, the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Justice Knauss

delivered the opinion of the Court.

Plaintiff, a guest in defendant’s automobile, was injured when defendant’s automobile collided with another vehicle, and sued for damages. The defense was under section 371, chapter 16, 1935 C.S.A., commonly known as the guest statute. Plaintiff had judgment based on a jury verdict in his favor. Defendant brings the cause here by writ of error.

[287] On authority of Clark v. Hicks, 127 Colo. 25, 252 P. (2d) 1067; Dameron v. West, 126 Colo. 435, 250 P. (2d) 592, and Murrow v. Whiteley, 125 Colo. 392, 244 P. (2d) 657, the judgment is affirmed.

Bundy v. Bien, 269 P.2d 707, 129 Colo. 286, 1954 Colo. LEXIS 402 (Colo. 1954).

Pincite

269 P.2d 707 (Bundy v. Bien) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related