Bundschuh v. Moranti & Raymond, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Bundschuh v. Moranti & Raymond, Inc.

236 A.D. 652

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 15, 1932

StatusPublished

This text of 236 A.D. 652 (Bundschuh v. Moranti & Raymond, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bundschuh v. Moranti & Raymond, Inc., 236 A.D. 652 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1932).

Pincite

Opinions

Judgment in so far as appealed from by defendant Moranti & Raymond, Inc. (also known as Paul J. Moranti, Inc.), affirmed, with costs to the plaintiff against said defendant. Judgment in so far as appealed from by plaintiff affirmed, with costs to the defendant The City of New York. Present — Finch, P. J., Merrell, McAvoy, Martin and O’Malley, JJ.; Finch, P. J., and O’Malley, J., dissent and vote to reverse and grant a new trial as to The City of New York, with costs to the plaintiff to abide the event. No opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment in so far as appealed from by defendant Moranti & Raymond, Inc. (also known as Paul J. Moranti, Inc.), affirmed, with costs to the plaintiff against said defendant. Judgment in so far as appealed from by plaintiff affirmed, with costs to the defendant The City of New York. Present — Finch, P. J., Merrell, McAvoy, Martin and O’Malley, JJ.; Finch, P. J., and O’Malley, J., dissent and vote to reverse and grant a new trial as to The City of New York, with costs to the plaintiff to abide the event. No opinion.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

236 A.D. 652, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bundschuh-v-moranti-raymond-inc-nyappdiv-1932.