Buncombe County ex rel. Child Enforcement Support Agency v. Peek

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Buncombe County ex rel. Child Enforcement Support Agency v. Peek

421 S.E.2d 788, 107 N.C. App. 723, 1992 N.C. App. LEXIS 786

CourtCourt of Appeals of North Carolina

DecidedOctober 20, 1992

DocketNo. 9128DC1068

StatusPublished

This text of 421 S.E.2d 788 (Buncombe County ex rel. Child Enforcement Support Agency v. Peek) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Buncombe County ex rel. Child Enforcement Support Agency v. Peek, 421 S.E.2d 788, 107 N.C. App. 723, 1992 N.C. App. LEXIS 786 (N.C. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

WYNN, Judge.

This case was consolidated for appeal with two prior actions: a paternity action in which the defendant was adjudicated to be the father of the subject minor child; and, a subsequent child support action in which the defendant was ordered to pay child support. The subject appeal is a challenge to the trial court’s order requiring defendant to post a cash bond to secure enforcement of the child support judgment. We reversed the underlying paternity action, Lombroia v. Peek, and remanded that case to the District Court for a new trial. As a result of our holding in Lombroia v. Peek, we reversed the Child Support Order. It follows [724]*724that we must also reverse the Security Bond Order and remand to the District Court for appropriate action.

Reversed and remanded.

Chief Judge HEDRICK and Judge LEWIS concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

WYNN, Judge.

This case was consolidated for appeal with two prior actions: a paternity action in which the defendant was adjudicated to be the father of the subject minor child; and, a subsequent child support action in which the defendant was ordered to pay child support. The subject appeal is a challenge to the trial court’s order requiring defendant to post a cash bond to secure enforcement of the child support judgment. We reversed the underlying paternity action, Lombroia v. Peek, and remanded that case to the District Court for a new trial. As a result of our holding in Lombroia v. Peek, we reversed the Child Support Order. It follows [724]*724that we must also reverse the Security Bond Order and remand to the District Court for appropriate action.

Reversed and remanded.

Chief Judge HEDRICK and Judge LEWIS concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

421 S.E.2d 788, 107 N.C. App. 723, 1992 N.C. App. LEXIS 786, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/buncombe-county-ex-rel-child-enforcement-support-agency-v-peek-ncctapp-1992.