Bunch v. McMillian

532 S.W.2d 893, 1976 Mo. App. LEXIS 1909
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Bunch v. McMillian. Read the opinion of the Court — 1978 Mo. App. LEXIS 2207
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided January 27, 1976·No. No. 9743·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The verdict of the jury was in favor of the plaintiffs. However, no judgment was entered on the' verdict. The minute or docket entry which appears in the transcript does not constitute a final judgment from which an appeal may be taken. State v. Henderson, 493 S.W.2d 31, 32[1] (Mo.App.1973) and authorities there cited. Anno. 73 A.L.R.2d 250 at p. 302. The docket entry merely summarized procedural steps which were taken on the day of the trial including the appearances, selection of the jury, opening statements, the offering of evidence, in-trial motions, the arguments, and the contents of the verdict. This court has no jurisdiction of this premature appeal. Peacock v. City of Dexter, 530 S.W.2d 272 (Mo.App.1975, Springfield District.)

The appeal is dismissed.

All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bunch v. McMillian, 532 S.W.2d 893, 1976 Mo. App. LEXIS 1909 (Mo. Ct. App. 1976).

532 S.W.2d 893 (Bunch v. McMillian) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Henderson
493 S.W.2d 31 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1973)
Peacock v. City of Dexter
530 S.W.2d 272 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1975)