Bunch v. Hirn

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Bunch v. Hirn

706 So. 2d 441, 1997 La. LEXIS 4011, 1997 WL 807892

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedDecember 19, 1997

DocketNo. 97-C-2419

StatusPublished

This text of 706 So. 2d 441 (Bunch v. Hirn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bunch v. Hirn, 706 So. 2d 441, 1997 La. LEXIS 4011, 1997 WL 807892 (La. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

In re Arnica Mutual Ins. Co.; — Defendants); applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; Parish of Orleans, Civil District Court, Div. “M”, No. 93-02461; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 96CA-2277.

[442]*442Granted in part; otherwise denied. The court of appeal did not err in reversing the district court’s ..judgment granting summary judgment in favor of Arnica. The court of appeal did err, however, by disposing fully of the issue of whether Arnica has waived all of its coverage defenses. This issue is not resolved by the court of appeal’s reversing a pro-defendant summary judgment, nor by the trial court’s denial of the plaintiffs motion for summary judgment: It is an issue that remains to be tried in-the trial court on remand.

JOHNSON, J., would deny the writ. MARCUS, J., not on panel.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Arnica Mutual Ins. Co.; — Defendants); applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; Parish of Orleans, Civil District Court, Div. “M”, No. 93-02461; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 96CA-2277.

[442]*442Granted in part; otherwise denied. The court of appeal did not err in reversing the district court’s ..judgment granting summary judgment in favor of Arnica. The court of appeal did err, however, by disposing fully of the issue of whether Arnica has waived all of its coverage defenses. This issue is not resolved by the court of appeal’s reversing a pro-defendant summary judgment, nor by the trial court’s denial of the plaintiffs motion for summary judgment: It is an issue that remains to be tried in-the trial court on remand.

JOHNSON, J., would deny the writ. MARCUS, J., not on panel.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

706 So. 2d 441, 1997 La. LEXIS 4011, 1997 WL 807892, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bunch-v-hirn-la-1997.