Bunce v. Woodruff

Saratoga Chancery Court

Bunce v. Woodruff

1 Sarat. Ch. Sent. 51, 1841 N.Y. LEXIS 351

DecidedJuly 20, 1841

StatusPublished

This text of 1 Sarat. Ch. Sent. 51 (Bunce v. Woodruff) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Saratoga Chancery Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bunce v. Woodruff, 1 Sarat. Ch. Sent. 51, 1841 N.Y. LEXIS 351 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1841).

Pincite

Opinion

This was an application by the defendant for an order to stay the proceedings in a foreclosure suit until the suit upon the defendant’s cross-bill should be in readiness for hearing, so that both suits might be heard together. The court denied the application, with costs, because the cross-bill does not set up any valid defense to the foreclosure suit, and is not in support of any defense set up in the answer in that suit; and because the *cross-bill was not filed until after the proofs in the foreclosure suit were closed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

This was an application by the defendant for an order to stay the proceedings in a foreclosure suit until the suit upon the defendant’s cross-bill should be in readiness for hearing, so that both suits might be heard together. The court denied the application, with costs, because the cross-bill does not set up any valid defense to the foreclosure suit, and is not in support of any defense set up in the answer in that suit; and because the *cross-bill was not filed until after the proofs in the foreclosure suit were closed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Sarat. Ch. Sent. 51, 1841 N.Y. LEXIS 351, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bunce-v-woodruff-nychanctsara-1841.