Bunce v. Bunce
1 Kirby 137
Opinion
There is no defect in the declaration, to justify the decision of the Court of Common Pleas. There- is alleged a promise, and a breach, and a consideration sufficient to raise a promise. The defendant having borrowed and had the money for which the bond was given, it was his duty to pay the bond; and what the said Zachariah, his surety, paid upon it, he paid for the use of the defendant, who became indebted to him upon such payment; which was a sufficient consideration, or indebtedness, to raise the promise laid in the plaintiff’s declaration.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bunce v. Bunce, 1 Kirby 137 (Colo. Ct. App. 1786).
1 Kirby 137 (Bunce v. Bunce) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.