Bumpass v. Webb

1 Stew. 19
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedJanuary 15, 1827
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 1 Stew. 19 (Bumpass v. Webb) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bumpass v. Webb, 1 Stew. 19 (Ala. 1827).

Opinion

JUDGE CRENSHAW

delivered the opinion of the • Court.

The defendant introduced the answer and exhibits as evidence, assenting that the plaintiff might have the entire benefit of them. The whole of them were then before the [20]*20jury, and either party, at any stage of the argument, bad a right to refer to, and to read all or any part of them.

Though a partner cannot maintain an action at law, against his copartner, on a transaction concerning the co-partnership, he may maintain such action for the excess which he has contributed over and above his proportion, of the joint stock.

If the contract was, that each party should contribute equally to the purchase of the land, and the plaintiff in the action contributed more than his part, the excess was money paid and advanced to the defendant’s use, and recoverable in an action at law. Let the judgement be affirmed.

Judge Gayle not sitting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Tiner v. State
122 So. 2d 738 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1960)
Jones v. Cade
94 So. 255 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1922)
Robinson v. Bullock
58 Ala. 618 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1877)
Scott v. Campbell
30 Ala. 728 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1857)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Stew. 19, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bumpass-v-webb-ala-1827.