Bump v. City of Wilmington

129 S.E. 726, 190 N.C. 866, 1925 N.C. LEXIS 217
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedOctober 21, 1925
StatusPublished

This text of 129 S.E. 726 (Bump v. City of Wilmington) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bump v. City of Wilmington, 129 S.E. 726, 190 N.C. 866, 1925 N.C. LEXIS 217 (N.C. 1925).

Opinion

Pee CueiaM.

An examination of the record satisfies us that the trial court committed no prejudicial error in rejecting the evidence of Quin-livan, for that it appeared that the locus in quo had been repaired since the injury and before the examination by the witness.

There was no evidence to support the issue of contributory negligence. The court is not required by statute to give the contentions of the parties. We are of the opinion that, in the instant case,, no prejudicial error resulted in reciting the contentions of plaintiff in her exact language. There was ample evidence to support the verdict. Therefore, we hold that there is

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
129 S.E. 726, 190 N.C. 866, 1925 N.C. LEXIS 217, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bump-v-city-of-wilmington-nc-1925.