Bumford v. State

14 S.E.2d 611, 65 Ga. App. 38, 1941 Ga. App. LEXIS 246
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedMay 6, 1941
Docket28948; 28949; 28950
StatusPublished

This text of 14 S.E.2d 611 (Bumford v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bumford v. State, 14 S.E.2d 611, 65 Ga. App. 38, 1941 Ga. App. LEXIS 246 (Ga. Ct. App. 1941).

Opinion

Gardner, J.

These defendants were jointly convicted of obstructing a railroad-track. Their motions for new trial were overruled. Each of them filed a bill of exceptions. The evidence against each of them was substantially the same, save that the jury were authorized to find that Carpenter and Walker had made confessions. As to Bumford, no confession was offered in evidence. But for the confessions there was no sufficient evidence to convict Carpenter and Walker. The corpus delicti was proved. This proof in connection with the confessions was sufficient to convict Carpenter and Walker. The evidence was only circumstantial as to Bum-ford, and was insufficient to exclude every reasonable hypothesis save that of his guilt.

Judgment reversed m £8948. Judgments affirmed in £8949 and £8950.

Broyles, C. J., and MacIntyre, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
14 S.E.2d 611, 65 Ga. App. 38, 1941 Ga. App. LEXIS 246, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bumford-v-state-gactapp-1941.