Bultman v. New York El. R. R. Co.

42 N.Y. St. Rep. 958
The Superior Court of New York City·Decided January 11, 1892·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

A careful examination and analysis of the evidence discloses-no reason for disturbing the result arrived at by the learned judge below, and. none of the exceptions appears to have sufficient merit to work a reversal.

The judgment should be affirmed, with costs.

Freedman, McAdam and Gildersleeve, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bultman v. New York El. R. R. Co., 42 N.Y. St. Rep. 958 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1892).

42 N.Y. St. Rep. 958 (Bultman v. New York El. R. R. Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.