Bulot v. Justice

529 So. 2d 166, 1988 La. App. LEXIS 1840, 1988 WL 78984
Louisiana Court of Appeal·Decided July 28, 1988·No. No. 88-C-486·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

WRIT DENIED.

Although we can understand the plight of the relators in trying to collect the judgment they have against the Jefferson Parish Clerk of Court’s Office, we also take cognizance of the provisions of the law which exempts the Clerk of Court from seizure.

LSA-Constitution Article 12, Section 10, indicates that “no public property or public funds shall be subject to seizure.”

Public Officers, such as the Clerk of Court, are deemed to be a separate “local [167]*167governmental subdivision”. See R.S. 42:1441.2.

Accordingly, we so hold that the office of the Clerk of Court is not subject to seizure.

The continued operation of the Office of Clerk of Court is essential to all aspects of government in Jefferson Parish and we do recognize that the Clerk of Court here has a moral obligation to pay the judgment rendered against the office and therefore should take steps to obtain necessary funds to settle this matter.

For the foregoing reasons, the Writ and Stay Order is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bulot v. Justice, 529 So. 2d 166, 1988 La. App. LEXIS 1840, 1988 WL 78984 (La. Ct. App. 1988).

529 So. 2d 166 (Bulot v. Justice) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bulot v. Justice
552 So. 2d 1344 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1989)