Bullock v. Wallingford

55 N.H. 619, 1875 N.H. LEXIS 138
Supreme Court of New Hampshire·Decided August 12, 1875·Published

Opinions

Evidence — Certificate of public officer. I think the paper signed by J. M. Thacher, acting commissioner of patents, was clearly inadmissible. It is not and does not purport to be a copy of any record or paper existing in the pension office, but is simply the statement of a fact within the knowledge of the gentlemen who signed it. The plaintiff was entitled to have that fact proved in the usual way, and could not legally be deprived of the privilege of cross-examination by the form in which the statement was put. I think the verdict must be set aside.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bullock v. Wallingford, 55 N.H. 619, 1875 N.H. LEXIS 138 (N.H. 1875).

55 N.H. 619 (Bullock v. Wallingford) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Inhabitants of Hanson v. Inhabitants of South Scituate
115 Mass. 336 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1874)