Bullock v. State

41 S.E. 609, 115 Ga. 241, 1902 Ga. LEXIS 370
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedApril 24, 1902
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 41 S.E. 609 (Bullock v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bullock v. State, 41 S.E. 609, 115 Ga. 241, 1902 Ga. LEXIS 370 (Ga. 1902).

Opinion

Little, J.

1. None of the grounds of the motion for a new trial assign any specific error as having been committed by the trial judge in giving the charges complained of. They can not, therefore, be considered, except to ascertain whether they contain correct abstract propositions of law. Anderson v. Southern Railway Co., 107 Ga. 501 (4). So considered, no error appears.

2. The evidence supports the verdict, and the judgment overruling the motioh . for a new trial is

Affirmed.

All the Justices concurring, except Lewis, J., absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Pratt v. State
142 S.E. 903 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1928)
Grant v. State
45 S.E. 603 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1903)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
41 S.E. 609, 115 Ga. 241, 1902 Ga. LEXIS 370, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bullock-v-state-ga-1902.