Bullock v. State
This text of 41 S.E. 609 (Bullock v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. None of the grounds of the motion for a new trial assign any specific error as having been committed by the trial judge in giving the charges complained of. They can not, therefore, be considered, except to ascertain whether they contain correct abstract propositions of law. Anderson v. Southern Railway Co., 107 Ga. 501 (4). So considered, no error appears.
2. The evidence supports the verdict, and the judgment overruling the motioh . for a new trial is
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
41 S.E. 609, 115 Ga. 241, 1902 Ga. LEXIS 370, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bullock-v-state-ga-1902.