Bullock v. Jeffries

194 A. 159, 119 N.J.L. 27, 1937 N.J. LEXIS 239
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided September 22, 1937·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment of the Supreme Court dismissing the writ of certiorari must be affirmed. The opinion of that court, 117 N. J. L. 595, shows that it based its judgment on two grounds; laches and illegal creation of the position which the appellant claims the right to hold and occupy.

We base our conclusion that the judgment under review must be affirmed solely on the latter ground and not upon the grounds of laches.

*28 The judgment of the Supreme Court is affirmed, with costs.

For affirmance — The Chief Justice, Teenchaed, Case, Bodine, Donges, Hehee, Deae, WolesKeil, Raeeeety, Cole, JJ. 10.

For reversal — Peeskie, J. 1.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bullock v. Jeffries, 194 A. 159, 119 N.J.L. 27, 1937 N.J. LEXIS 239 (N.J. 1937).

194 A. 159 (Bullock v. Jeffries) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kovalycsik v. City of Garfield
156 A.2d 31 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1959)
City of Jersey City v. Department of Civil Service
81 A.2d 777 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1951)