Bullock v. Jackson

96 S.E. 685, 110 S.C. 480, 1918 S.C. LEXIS 79
Supreme Court of South Carolina·Decided August 31, 1918·No. 10077·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Gage.

The plaintiff, a tenant, sued the defendant, a landowner, to restrain the defendant from interfering with plaintiff’s entry upon land to gather the crops which the plaintiff had made' in 1917. The Circuit Judge late in January, 1918, ordered that the plaintiff be allowed to gather his crops and deposit the proceeds with the clerk of Court, there to be held subject to a settlement of the dispute of the parties. From that order comes this appeal.

1 The necessary inference is that the order has been executed, and the fund is now in the clerk’s hands.

2 If that be so it is idle to now inquire if the order was right.

The appeal is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bullock v. Jackson, 96 S.E. 685, 110 S.C. 480, 1918 S.C. LEXIS 79 (S.C. 1918).

96 S.E. 685 (Bullock v. Jackson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kirkland v. Aiken County Board of Education
97 S.E.2d 680 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1955)