Bullock v. Edwards

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Bullock v. Edwards

100 A.D.3d 882, 953 N.Y.S.2d 883

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 21, 2012

StatusPublished

This text of 100 A.D.3d 882 (Bullock v. Edwards) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bullock v. Edwards, 100 A.D.3d 882, 953 N.Y.S.2d 883 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

In a child support proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 4, the mother appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Family Court, Kings County (Katz, J), dated September 28, 2011, as denied her objections to so much of an order of the same court (Milsap, S.M.), dated August 5, 2011, as fixed the father’s child support obligation at the sum of $686.93 semi-monthly.

Ordered that the order dated September 28, 2011, is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Contrary to the mother’s contention, the Support Magistrate properly applied the factors set forth in Family Court Act § 413 (1) (f) in determining the father’s child support obligation (see Family Ct Act § 413 [1] [f]; Matter of Cassano v Cassano, 85 NY2d 649, 651 [1995]). Angiolillo, J.E, Austin, Sgroi and Miller, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a child support proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 4, the mother appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Family Court, Kings County (Katz, J), dated September 28, 2011, as denied her objections to so much of an order of the same court (Milsap, S.M.), dated August 5, 2011, as fixed the father’s child support obligation at the sum of $686.93 semi-monthly.

Ordered that the order dated September 28, 2011, is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Contrary to the mother’s contention, the Support Magistrate properly applied the factors set forth in Family Court Act § 413 (1) (f) in determining the father’s child support obligation (see Family Ct Act § 413 [1] [f]; Matter of Cassano v Cassano, 85 NY2d 649, 651 [1995]). Angiolillo, J.E, Austin, Sgroi and Miller, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

100 A.D.3d 882, 953 N.Y.S.2d 883, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bullock-v-edwards-nyappdiv-2012.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack