Bullock v. Dunbar

17 Tex. 243
Texas Supreme Court·Decided July 1, 1856·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Wheeler, J.

The plea of set-off was manifestly insufficient, in that it did not allege that the beneficial interest and ownership of the note sued on was not in the plaintiff, but in Ford, & Co., either at or after the time of the purchase by the defendants, of the note pleaded in set-off. The Court therefore did not err in sustaining exceptions to the plea ; and the judgment is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bullock v. Dunbar, 17 Tex. 243 (Tex. 1856).

17 Tex. 243 (Bullock v. Dunbar) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Young v. O'Neal
54 Tex. 544 (Texas Supreme Court, 1881)