Bullock v. Dunbar
17 Tex. 243
Opinion
The plea of set-off was manifestly insufficient, in that it did not allege that the beneficial interest and ownership of the note sued on was not in the plaintiff, but in Ford, & Co., either at or after the time of the purchase by the defendants, of the note pleaded in set-off. The Court therefore did not err in sustaining exceptions to the plea ; and the judgment is affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bullock v. Dunbar, 17 Tex. 243 (Tex. 1856).
17 Tex. 243 (Bullock v. Dunbar) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Young v. O'Neal
54 Tex. 544 (Texas Supreme Court, 1881)