Bullock v. Dunbar

Texas Supreme Court

Bullock v. Dunbar

17 Tex. 243

CourtTexas Supreme Court

DecidedJuly 1, 1856

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 17 Tex. 243 (Bullock v. Dunbar) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bullock v. Dunbar, 17 Tex. 243 (Tex. 1856).

Pincite

Opinion

Wheeler, J.

The plea of set-off was manifestly insufficient, in that it did not allege that the beneficial interest and ownership of the note sued on was not in the plaintiff, but in Ford, & Co., either at or after the time of the purchase by the defendants, of the note pleaded in set-off. The Court therefore did not err in sustaining exceptions to the plea ; and the judgment is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wheeler, J.

The plea of set-off was manifestly insufficient, in that it did not allege that the beneficial interest and ownership of the note sued on was not in the plaintiff, but in Ford, & Co., either at or after the time of the purchase by the defendants, of the note pleaded in set-off. The Court therefore did not err in sustaining exceptions to the plea ; and the judgment is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

17 Tex. 243, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bullock-v-dunbar-tex-1856.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack