Bullock v. Bullock

Ohio Court of Appeals

Bullock v. Bullock

23 Ohio Law. Abs. 608, 1937 Ohio Misc. LEXIS 1242

CourtOhio Court of Appeals

DecidedJanuary 20, 1937

DocketNo 2725

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 23 Ohio Law. Abs. 608 (Bullock v. Bullock) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bullock v. Bullock, 23 Ohio Law. Abs. 608, 1937 Ohio Misc. LEXIS 1242 (Ohio Ct. App. 1937).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION

By THE COURT

The above entitled cause is now being determined on motion of appellee to dismiss appellant’s appeal on the ground that appellant has filed no bill of exceptions. The Supreme Court of Ohio has determined that it is not a proper procedure to dismiss an error proceeding on the ground that a bill of exceptions has not been filed.

This was on the theory that the case is properly in court and error may be manifest in other ways than in the bill of exceptions. If perchance it develops that the error is not manifest except through the bill of exceptions then the proper procedure is to enter judgment against the appellant.

The motion to dismsis will not be allowed.

Exceptions will be ordered.

CRAIG, PJ, BARNES and HORNBECK, JJ, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI