Bullock v. . Bullock

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Bullock v. . Bullock

14 N.C. 260

CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina

DecidedDecember 5, 1831

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 14 N.C. 260 (Bullock v. . Bullock) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bullock v. . Bullock, 14 N.C. 260 (N.C. 1831).

Pincite

Opinion

Ruepin, Judge.

The court is precluded from considering the judge’s charge by the verdjet on the general issue. It is found by the jury that the defendant’s testator did not assume ; which puts the other issue, on the statute of limitations, and the instructions of the Superior Court on it out of the question. As the existence of the debt is negatived, the judgment must of course be affirmed: To this Morisey v. Bunting, (ante 1 vol. 3,) besides other cases, is a direct authority.

Per Curiam.--‘Judgment appirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ruepin, Judge.

The court is precluded from considering the judge’s charge by the verdjet on the general issue. It is found by the jury that the defendant’s testator did not assume ; which puts the other issue, on the statute of limitations, and the instructions of the Superior Court on it out of the question. As the existence of the debt is negatived, the judgment must of course be affirmed: To this Morisey v. Bunting, (ante 1 vol. 3,) besides other cases, is a direct authority.

Per Curiam.--‘Judgment appirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

14 N.C. 260, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bullock-v-bullock-nc-1831.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack