Bulletin Company v. Victor E. Origoni

387 F.2d 240, 128 U.S. App. D.C. 282, 1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 6481
CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
DecidedMay 8, 1967
Docket20704_1
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 387 F.2d 240 (Bulletin Company v. Victor E. Origoni) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bulletin Company v. Victor E. Origoni, 387 F.2d 240, 128 U.S. App. D.C. 282, 1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 6481 (D.C. Cir. 1967).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

This cause came on for hearing on the record on appeal from the United States *241 District Court for the District of Columbia, and was argued by counsel.

This interlocutory appeal certifies for our consideration the question as to whether Layne v. Tribune Co., 63 App.D.C. 213, 71 F.2d 223, cert. denied, 293 U.S. 572, 55 S.Ct. 83, 79 L.Ed. 670 (1934), and Neely v. Philadelphia Inquirer Co., 61 App.D.C. 334, 62 F.2d 873 (1932), have been overruled sub silentio. We hold that they have not.

It is ordered that the judgment of the District Court denying the motion to quash service of summons and dismiss the complaint be, and it is hereby, reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Akbar v. New York Magazine Co.
490 F. Supp. 60 (District of Columbia, 1980)
M. C. Edwards v. The Associated Press
512 F.2d 258 (Fifth Circuit, 1975)
Milton Margoles, M.D. v. Alida Johns
483 F.2d 1212 (D.C. Circuit, 1973)
Margoles v. Johns
333 F. Supp. 942 (District of Columbia, 1971)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
387 F.2d 240, 128 U.S. App. D.C. 282, 1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 6481, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bulletin-company-v-victor-e-origoni-cadc-1967.