Bullerdick v. Miller

Indiana Court of Appeals

Bullerdick v. Miller

155 N.E. 832, 86 Ind. App. 66, 1927 Ind. App. LEXIS 54

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Bullerdick v. Miller. Read the opinion of the Court — 85 Ind. App. 369 →

Indiana Court of Appeals·Decided April 8, 1927·No. No. 12,588.·Published

Opinion

Nichols, J. —

This was an independent action, under §589 Burns 1914, §614 Bums 1926, to procure a new trial on the ground of newly-discovered evidence. The original action was appealed to this court on the merits, the error assigned being the action of the court in overruling appellant’s motion for a new trial for cause. See Bullerdick v. Miller (1926), 85 Ind. App. 369, 152 N. E. 280. The judgment on that appeal having been reversed with instructions to the trial court to grant a new trial, the question here involved becomes moot.

The appeal is therefore dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Nichols, J. —

This was an independent action, under §589 Burns 1914, §614 Bums 1926, to procure a new trial on the ground of newly-discovered evidence. The original action was appealed to this court on the merits, the error assigned being the action of the court in overruling appellant’s motion for a new trial for cause. See Bullerdick v. Miller (1926), 85 Ind. App. 369, 152 N. E. 280. The judgment on that appeal having been reversed with instructions to the trial court to grant a new trial, the question here involved becomes moot.

The appeal is therefore dismissed.

Bullerdick v. Miller, 155 N.E. 832, 86 Ind. App. 66, 1927 Ind. App. LEXIS 54 (Ind. Ct. App. 1927).

Pincite

155 N.E. 832 (Bullerdick v. Miller) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related