Bullard v. Young

Fourth Circuit

Bullard v. Young

510 F. App'x 305

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 25, 2013·No. No. 12-7538·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Appellants appeal the district court’s order denying relief on their 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Bullard v. Young, No. 5:12-ct-03093-FL (E.D.N.C. Aug. 22, 2012). We deny Appellants’ motion to compel an answer and for grant of motions filed in the district court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately [306]*306presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Appellants appeal the district court’s order denying relief on their 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Bullard v. Young, No. 5:12-ct-03093-FL (E.D.N.C. Aug. 22, 2012). We deny Appellants’ motion to compel an answer and for grant of motions filed in the district court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately [306]*306presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Bullard v. Young, 510 F. App'x 305 (4th Cir. 2013).

Pincite

510 F. App'x 305 (Bullard v. Young) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related