Bullard v. Young

510 F. App'x 305
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 25, 2013
DocketNo. 12-7538
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 510 F. App'x 305 (Bullard v. Young) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bullard v. Young, 510 F. App'x 305 (4th Cir. 2013).

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Appellants appeal the district court’s order denying relief on their 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Bullard v. Young, No. 5:12-ct-03093-FL (E.D.N.C. Aug. 22, 2012). We deny Appellants’ motion to compel an answer and for grant of motions filed in the district court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately [306]*306presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

JANDREW v. SHARPE
M.D. North Carolina, 2025

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
510 F. App'x 305, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bullard-v-young-ca4-2013.