Bullard v. State

32 So. 3d 177, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 4288, 2010 WL 1233499
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Bullard v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 500
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 1, 2010·No. 5D09-2520·Published

Opinion

GRIFFIN, J.

James Lee Bullard [“Bullard”] appeals the trial court’s denial of his petition for writ of habeas corpus. We affirm.

In 2008, the State charged Bullard with driving while license revoked as a habitual traffic offender in violation of section 322.34(5), Florida Statutes (2008). Bullard pled nolo contendere to the charge, and he was accordingly adjudicated and sentenced. Thereafter, Bullard filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus with the trial court, alleging he is being illegally detained because the State was allowed to use his pre-1997 convictions to enhance his conviction for driving with a suspended license to a felony in case number 2008-CF-13769, contrary to the Florida Supreme Court’s ruling in Thompson v. State, 887 So.2d 1260 (Fla.2004).

As correctly found by the trial court, habeas corpus is not a proper vehicle to raise this issue, nor is there any merit to his claim.

AFFIRMED.

PALMER and JACOBUS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bullard v. State, 32 So. 3d 177, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 4288, 2010 WL 1233499 (Fla. Ct. App. 2010).

32 So. 3d 177 (Bullard v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Thompson v. State
887 So. 2d 1260 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2004)