Bullard v. Panasonic Corp. of North America

193 F. App'x 260
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 8, 2006·No. 06-1311·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

MaryAnn Bullard appeals the district court’s dismissal of her complaint alleging employment discrimination, retaliatory discharge, sexual harassment and disparate treatment under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Title VII”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Bullard v. Panasonic Corp. of North Am., 418 F.Supp.2d 802 (E.D.Va.2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bullard v. Panasonic Corp. of North America, 193 F. App'x 260 (4th Cir. 2006).

193 F. App'x 260 (Bullard v. Panasonic Corp. of North America) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bullard v. Panasonic Corp. of North America
418 F. Supp. 2d 802 (E.D. Virginia, 2006)