Bullard v. Panasonic Corp. of North America
This text of 193 F. App'x 260 (Bullard v. Panasonic Corp. of North America) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MaryAnn Bullard appeals the district court’s dismissal of her complaint alleging employment discrimination, retaliatory discharge, sexual harassment and disparate treatment under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Title VII”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Bullard v. Panasonic Corp. of North Am., 418 F.Supp.2d 802 (E.D.Va.2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
193 F. App'x 260, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bullard-v-panasonic-corp-of-north-america-ca4-2006.