Bullard v. Kenyon
This text of 24 N.Y.S. 374 (Bullard v. Kenyon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Heretofore the judgment of the trial court in this case was affirmed by this court upon appeal. Subsequently, at the February term, 1893, of this court, a reargument of the appeal was ordered. Upon a reconsideration of the case, we are satisfied that it comes plainly within the rules laid down in Karst v. Gane, 136 N. Y. 316, 32 N. E. Rep. 1073, and that, following that case, the judgment herein should be reversed, and a new trial ordered, costs to abide the event.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
24 N.Y.S. 374, 70 Hun 599, 77 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 599, 53 N.Y. St. Rep. 731, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bullard-v-kenyon-nysupct-1893.