Bullard v. Kenyon

24 N.Y.S. 374, 70 Hun 599, 77 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 599, 53 N.Y. St. Rep. 731
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 8, 1893
StatusPublished

This text of 24 N.Y.S. 374 (Bullard v. Kenyon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bullard v. Kenyon, 24 N.Y.S. 374, 70 Hun 599, 77 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 599, 53 N.Y. St. Rep. 731 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1893).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Heretofore the judgment of the trial court in this case was affirmed by this court upon appeal. Subsequently, at the February term, 1893, of this court, a reargument of the appeal was ordered. Upon a reconsideration of the case, we are satisfied that it comes plainly within the rules laid down in Karst v. Gane, 136 N. Y. 316, 32 N. E. Rep. 1073, and that, following that case, the judgment herein should be reversed, and a new trial ordered, costs to abide the event.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Karst v. . Gane
32 N.E. 1073 (New York Court of Appeals, 1893)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
24 N.Y.S. 374, 70 Hun 599, 77 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 599, 53 N.Y. St. Rep. 731, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bullard-v-kenyon-nysupct-1893.