Bullard v. Johnson
141 S.E.2d 472, 264 N.C. 371, 1965 N.C. LEXIS 1193
Opinion
A note given for a gambling debt is void and no action thereon can be maintained. G.S. 16-1; Bank v. Crafton, 181 N.C. 404, 107 S.E. 316. Plaintiff makes numerous assignments of error based on 21 exceptions. The record has been carefully examined and each of the exceptions fully considered. They present no unusual or novel question of law, and point to no error warranting a new trial.
No error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bullard v. Johnson, 141 S.E.2d 472, 264 N.C. 371, 1965 N.C. LEXIS 1193 (N.C. 1965).
141 S.E.2d 472 (Bullard v. Johnson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Wachovia Bank & Trust Co. v. Crafton
107 S.E. 316 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1921)