Bullard v. Hightower

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Bullard v. Hightower

111 S.E. 64, 28 Ga. App. 316, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 478

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedMarch 7, 1922

Docket13077

StatusPublished

This text of 111 S.E. 64 (Bullard v. Hightower) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bullard v. Hightower, 111 S.E. 64, 28 Ga. App. 316, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 478 (Ga. Ct. App. 1922).

Pincite

Opinion

Luke, J.

The several special assignments of error in this case are but amplifications of the general grounds, and are resolved into the single ground that the evidence did not authorize the verdict. There is some evidence to authorize the verdict, and the verdict has the approval of the trial judge. For no reason assigned did the court err in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Luke, J.

The several special assignments of error in this case are but amplifications of the general grounds, and are resolved into the single ground that the evidence did not authorize the verdict. There is some evidence to authorize the verdict, and the verdict has the approval of the trial judge. For no reason assigned did the court err in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

111 S.E. 64, 28 Ga. App. 316, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 478, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bullard-v-hightower-gactapp-1922.