Bullard v. Bender

251 A.D.2d 526, 673 N.Y.S.2d 921, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7539

Opinion

—In [527] an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Orange County (Peter C. Patsalos, J.), dated July 21, 1997, which granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and denied the plaintiffs cross motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. After the defendant made a prima facie showing of entitlement to summary judgment, the plaintiff offered nothing but conclusory assertions and failed to present any genuine factual issue which would preclude summary relief (see, Friends of Animals v Associated Fur Mfrs., 46 NY2d 1065; Sarver v Martyn, 161 AD2d 623). Rosenblatt, J. P., Sullivan, Joy, Altman and Luciano, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bullard v. Bender, 251 A.D.2d 526, 673 N.Y.S.2d 921, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7539 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

251 A.D.2d 526 (Bullard v. Bender) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Friends of Animals, Inc. v. Associated Fur Manufacturers, Inc.
390 N.E.2d 298 (New York Court of Appeals, 1979)
Sarver v. Martyn
161 A.D.2d 623 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)