Bullard v. Barker

13 F. App'x 134
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 3, 2001·No. 99-7219·Unpublished·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Vonnie Ray Bullard appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. We therefore deny a certificate of probable cause and dismiss in part, and affirm in part on the reasoning of the district court. See Bullard v. Barker, No. CA-96-370-5-BO (E.D.N.C. Aug. 2, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED IN PART, DISMISSED IN PART.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bullard v. Barker, 13 F. App'x 134 (4th Cir. 2001).

13 F. App'x 134 (Bullard v. Barker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related