Bull v. Wayco Oil Corp.

229 N.W. 597, 250 Mich. 51, 1930 Mich. LEXIS 916
CourtMichigan Supreme Court
DecidedMarch 7, 1930
DocketDocket No. 35, Calendar No. 34,367.
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 229 N.W. 597 (Bull v. Wayco Oil Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bull v. Wayco Oil Corp., 229 N.W. 597, 250 Mich. 51, 1930 Mich. LEXIS 916 (Mich. 1930).

Opinion

Clark, J.

Plaintiffs, as dependents, seek compensation for the death of Thomas R. Bull, an employee of defendant Wayco Oil Corporation, whose risk under the workmen’s compensation act (2 Comp. Laws 1915, § 5423 et seq.) was carried by the other defendant.

There were three employees at the oil station, Bull, Powers, and Jones. Jones owned a revolver kept at the station. Bull took the revolver to clean it. Powers picked it up, and accidently discharged it, killing Bull.

On review the department found correctly:

“We are of the opinion it is conclusively shown by the testimony in this record that it was not the policy of the company to permit their employees to keep firearms at their gasoline stations, and that their employees were instructed not to resist holdups or robberies on account of the danger to the attendant employees. We think the evidence conclusively shows that the employer did not know the employees of this particular station had this firearm at the station.”

It appears that the accident arose in the course of the employment. But as it did not arise out of the employment the department was right in refusing award.

*53 The case is ruled by Stocker v. Southfield Co., 244 Mich. 13.

Affirmed.

"Wiest, C. J., and Butzel, McDonald, Potter, Sharpe, North, and Fead, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Southland Corp. v. Hester
490 S.W.2d 132 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1973)
Arnold v. Wigdor Furniture Co.
281 S.W.2d 789 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1955)
Franks v. Point Marion Bridge Co.
193 A. 421 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1937)
Highway Oil Co. v. State Ex Rel. Bricker
198 N.E. 280 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1935)
Reed v. Sensenbaugh
86 S.W.2d 388 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1935)
Hicken v. Ebert-Hicken Co.
254 N.W. 615 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1934)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
229 N.W. 597, 250 Mich. 51, 1930 Mich. LEXIS 916, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bull-v-wayco-oil-corp-mich-1930.