Bull v. Roy

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Bull v. Roy

191 So. 2d 285, 1966 Fla. App. LEXIS 4495

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 9, 1966·No. No. 6430·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

Upon examination of the record-on-appeal in the instant case it appears that the appellant is attempting to appeal to this court an unsigned Circuit Court Minute Book entry as a final judgment.

This court held in Egantoff v. Herring, Fla.App.1965, 177 So.2d 260, that such a Minute Book entry was not a final judgment and therefore, non-appealable.

’The Egantoff holding was upheld by the Supreme Court of Florida in State of Florida, ex rel. Herring v. Allen et al., 189 So.2d 363, opinion filed May 25, 1966.

For the reasons stated, this appeal is dismissed ex mero motu.

SHANNON, Acting C. J., HOBSON, J., and MOODY, JAMES S., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Upon examination of the record-on-appeal in the instant case it appears that the appellant is attempting to appeal to this court an unsigned Circuit Court Minute Book entry as a final judgment.

This court held in Egantoff v. Herring, Fla.App.1965, 177 So.2d 260, that such a Minute Book entry was not a final judgment and therefore, non-appealable.

’The Egantoff holding was upheld by the Supreme Court of Florida in State of Florida, ex rel. Herring v. Allen et al., 189 So.2d 363, opinion filed May 25, 1966.

For the reasons stated, this appeal is dismissed ex mero motu.

SHANNON, Acting C. J., HOBSON, J., and MOODY, JAMES S., Associate Judge, concur.

Bull v. Roy, 191 So. 2d 285, 1966 Fla. App. LEXIS 4495 (Fla. Ct. App. 1966).

Pincite

191 So. 2d 285 (Bull v. Roy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinions

Related