Bull v. Hopkins

7 Johns. 22
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedNovember 15, 1810
StatusPublished
Cited by12 cases

This text of 7 Johns. 22 (Bull v. Hopkins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bull v. Hopkins, 7 Johns. 22 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1810).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The justice, in his supplementary return, refers to, and adopts, as correct and true, the facts stated in the affidavit of Hopkins; and from those-facts it appears, that the plaintiff’s demand below accrued subsequent to the former trial; and arose from the payment of money for the defendant’s use, which could not have been legally set off at the former trial, and so the former trial was no bar.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Inhabitants of Embden v. Lisherness
36 A. 1101 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1897)
Dillinger v. Kelley
84 Mo. 563 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1884)
Wisconsin v. Torinus
9 N.W. 725 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1881)
Baxter v. Aubrey
1 N.W. 897 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1879)
Oleson v. Merrihew
45 Wis. 397 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1878)
Bath v. Lindenmyer
1 Wyo. 240 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 1875)
Marcellus v. Countryman
65 Barb. 201 (New York Supreme Court, 1873)
McFarlane v. Cushman
21 Wis. 401 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1867)
Baker v. Rand
13 Barb. 152 (New York Supreme Court, 1852)
Hatch v. Benton
6 Barb. 28 (New York Supreme Court, 1849)
Kane v. Fisher
2 Watts 246 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1834)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
7 Johns. 22, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bull-v-hopkins-nysupct-1810.